Freeipa: idm: ipa: freeipa: obtaining tgs with impersonating cname through trust relationships
Published Aug 20, 2026
9.6
CRITICALCVSS 3.1
EPSS 0.22%
Description
A flaw was found in FreeIPA. When a trust relationship is configured between FreeIPA and Active Directory, Active Directory users can bypass authentication for FreeIPA services, including the portal, SMB server, and LDAP directory. This is possible by impersonating a client name in the Ticket Granting Service (TGS) due to FreeIPA services not verifying Privilege Attribute Certificate (PAC) certificates. This vulnerability could allow an authenticated Active Directory user to escalate their privileges within the FreeIPA domain.
Affected products
Default status is the baseline for the product, each version can override it (e.g. patched versions marked unaffected).
| Vendor | Product | Default status | Versions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | affected |
| |||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | affected |
|
Configuration 2
- 7.0
- 8.0
- 9.0
- 10.0
No data.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
ipa
Affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
ipa
Out of support scope
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
ipa
Affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
ipa
Affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
ipa
Affected
| Product | Package | State | Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | ipa | Affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | ipa | Out of support scope | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | ipa | Affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | ipa | Affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | ipa | Affected | n/a |
No package ranges for this CVE.
Remediation
Vendor solution
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Red Hat statement
This vulnerability is rated as Moderate because practical exploitation is significantly constrained by conditions that are unlikely to be met in most production environments. The attack requires a cross-realm trust to be configured between FreeIPA and Active Directory, the attacker must already hold a valid Active Directory account, and the impersonation technique depends on the ability to register a duplicate or conflicting Service Principal Name (SPN) in the Active Directory forest. Microsoft addressed this prerequisite by enforcing SPN and UPN uniqueness constraints on Windows Server 2012 R2 domain controllers with MSKB-3070083 applied, and by default on Windows 11 version 22H2 and later. In environments where the Active Directory domain controllers are patched and running a supported functional level, the attack path is blocked on the Windows side. Only deployments trusting an outdated or unpatched Active Directory environment remain realistically at risk, making this primarily a theoretical concern in modern, maintained environments.
Red Hat mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Metrics
No CVSS v4.0 score for this CVE.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
1 other source (Red Hat) ▾
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
No CVSS v3.0 score for this CVE.
No CVSS v2.0 score for this CVE.
This CVE is not in the KEV list.
CISA SSVC (Vulnrichment)
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization from CISA ADP.
Exploitation
NoneAutomatable
NoTechnical Impact
TotalDecision
n/aAssessed Aug 20, 2026 · SSVC 2.0.3
Estimated probability of exploitation in the wild in the next 30 days (FIRST EPSS). As of Oct 1, 2026.
Score over time
Aug–Oct 2026- EPSS v5
Percentile over time
- EPSS v5
Table of values (2 key points)
Flat stretches are collapsed; showing up to 120 newest points.
| Date | Score | Percentile | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | 0.22% (0.00222) | 11.58th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Aug 21, 2026 | 0.20% (0.00200) | 10.25th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
References (6)
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:70564 vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:72279 vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11861 vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHATVendor Advisory
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2487472 issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHATIssue TrackingVendor Advisory
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11861
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11861
| Link | Providers | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:70564 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT | |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:72279 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT | |
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11861 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHATVendor Advisory | |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2487472 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHATIssue TrackingVendor Advisory | |
| https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-11861 | ||
| https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-11861 |
Change history (0)
No recorded changes yet.