Reinstate some of "swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE""
Published Jul 16, 2024
5.5
MEDIUMCVSS 3.1
EPSS 0.27%
Description
swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE
The problem I'm addressing was discovered by the LTP test covering cve-2018-1000204.
A short description of what happens follows: 1) The test case issues a command code 00 (TEST UNIT READY) via the SG_IO interface with: dxfer_len == 524288, dxdfer_dir == SG_DXFER_FROM_DEV and a corresponding dxferp. The peculiar thing about this is that TUR is not reading from the device. 2) In sg_start_req() the invocation of blk_rq_map_user() effectively bounces the user-space buffer. As if the device was to transfer into it. Since commit a45b599ad808 ("scsi: sg: allocate with __GFP_ZERO in sg_build_indirect()") we make sure this first bounce buffer is allocated with GFP_ZERO. 3) For the rest of the story we keep ignoring that we have a TUR, so the device won't touch the buffer we prepare as if the we had a DMA_FROM_DEVICE type of situation. My setup uses a virtio-scsi device and the buffer allocated by SG is mapped by the function virtqueue_add_split() which uses DMA_FROM_DEVICE for the "in" sgs (here scatter-gather and not scsi generics). This mapping involves bouncing via the swiotlb (we need swiotlb to do virtio in protected guest like s390 Secure Execution, or AMD SEV). 4) When the SCSI TUR is done, we first copy back the content of the second (that is swiotlb) bounce buffer (which most likely contains some previous IO data), to the first bounce buffer, which contains all zeros. Then we copy back the content of the first bounce buffer to the user-space buffer. 5) The test case detects that the buffer, which it zero-initialized, ain't all zeros and fails.
One can argue that this is an swiotlb problem, because without swiotlb we leak all zeros, and the swiotlb should be transparent in a sense that it does not affect the outcome (if all other participants are well behaved).
Copying the content of the original buffer into the swiotlb buffer is the only way I can think of to make swiotlb transparent in such scenarios. So let's do just that if in doubt, but allow the driver to tell us that the whole mapped buffer is going to be overwritten, in which case we can preserve the old behavior and avoid the performance impact of the extra bounce.
Affected products
-
- Version StatusaffectedConstraints
- Version StatusaffectedConstraints
- Version StatusaffectedConstraints
- Version StatusaffectedConstraints
- Version StatusaffectedConstraints
- Version StatusaffectedConstraints
- Version StatusaffectedConstraints
- Version StatusaffectedConstraints
- Version StatusaffectedConstraints
- Version
-
- Version 2.6.12StatusaffectedConstraints-
- Version 0StatusunaffectedConstraints<2.6.12
- Version 4.14.281StatusunaffectedConstraints<=4.14.*
- Version 4.19.245StatusunaffectedConstraints<=4.19.*
- Version 4.9.320StatusunaffectedConstraints<=4.9.*
- Version 5.10.118StatusunaffectedConstraints<=5.10.*
- Version 5.15.33StatusunaffectedConstraints<=5.15.*
- Version 5.16.19StatusunaffectedConstraints<=5.16.*
- Version 5.17.2StatusunaffectedConstraints<=5.17.*
- Version 5.18StatusunaffectedConstraints<=*
- Version 5.4.196StatusunaffectedConstraints<=5.4.*
- Version
Default status is the baseline for the product, each version can override it (e.g. patched versions marked unaffected).
| Vendor | Product | Default status | Versions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | unaffected |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Linux | Linux | affected |
|
- < 4.9.320
- ≥ 4.10 · < 4.14.281
- ≥ 4.15 · < 4.19.245
- ≥ 4.20 · < 5.4.189
- ≥ 5.5 · < 5.10.110
- ≥ 5.11 · < 5.15.29
- ≥ 5.16 · < 5.16.15
No data.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
kernel
Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
kernel
Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
kernel-rt
Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
kernel
Will not fix
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
kernel-rt
Will not fix
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
kernel
Will not fix
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
kernel-rt
Affected
| Product | Package | State | Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | kernel | Not affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel | Not affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | kernel-rt | Not affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel | Will not fix | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | kernel-rt | Will not fix | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel | Will not fix | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | kernel-rt | Affected | n/a |
No package ranges for this CVE.
Remediation
Red Hat mitigation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Metrics
No CVSS v4.0 score for this CVE.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
1 other source (Red Hat) ▾
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
No CVSS v3.0 score for this CVE.
No CVSS v2.0 score for this CVE.
This CVE is not in the KEV list.
CISA SSVC (Vulnrichment)
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization from CISA ADP.
Exploitation
NoneAutomatable
NoTechnical Impact
PartialDecision
n/aAssessed Sep 10, 2024 · SSVC 2.0.3
Estimated probability of exploitation in the wild in the next 30 days (FIRST EPSS). As of Oct 3, 2026.
Score over time
2024–2026- EPSS v3
- EPSS v4
- EPSS v5
Percentile over time
- EPSS v3
- EPSS v4
- EPSS v5
Table of values (5 key points)
Flat stretches are collapsed; showing up to 120 newest points.
| Date | Score | Percentile | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2026 | 0.27% (0.00265) | 16.75th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Jun 15, 2026 | 0.27% (0.00265) | 17.65th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Mar 17, 2025 | 0.03% (0.00031) | 5.82th | v4 (v2025.03.14) |
| Dec 12, 2024 | 0.04% (0.00044) | 14.69th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Jul 17, 2024 | 0.04% (0.00044) | 13.42th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
References (22)
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-48853 Vendor Advisory
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2298194 Issue Tracking
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06cb238b0f7ac1669cb06390704c61794724c191
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/270475d6d2410ec66e971bf181afe1958dad565e Patch
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6bfc5377a210dbda2a237f16d94d1bd4f1335026 Patch
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7007c894631cf43041dcfa0da7142bbaa7eb673c
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7403f4118ab94be837ab9d770507537a8057bc63 Patch
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d9ac1b6665c73f23e963775f85d99679fd8e192 Patch
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/901c7280ca0d5e2b4a8929fbe0bfb007ac2a6544
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/971e5dadffd02beba1063e7dd9c3a82de17cf534 Patch
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aaf166f37eb6bb55d81c3e40a2a460c8875c8813
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b2f140a9f980806f572d672e1780acea66b9a25c
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c132f2ba716b5ee6b35f82226a6e5417d013d753 Patch
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d4d975e7921079f877f828099bb8260af335508f Patch
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcead36b19d999d687cd9c99b7f37520d9102b57
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddbd89deb7d32b1fbb879f48d68fda1a8ac58e8e Patch
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2141881b530738777c28bb51c62175895c8178b
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3f2247ac31cb71d1f05f56536df5946c6652f4a
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd97de9c7b973f46a6103f4170c5efc7b8ef8797
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024071626-CVE-2022-48853-c6d8@gregkh/T
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48853
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853
Change history (0)
No recorded changes yet.