Openshift: ClusterIP Service TLS certificate not checked by route controller if re-encrypt Route destinationCACertificate field is explicitly set to default serviceCA
Published Sep 1, 2022
6.5
MEDIUMCVSS 3.1
EPSS 0.41%
Description
An Improper Certificate Validation attack was found in Openshift. A re-encrypt Route with destinationCACertificate explicitly set to the default serviceCA skips internal Service TLS certificate validation. This flaw allows an attacker to exploit an invalid certificate, resulting in a loss of confidentiality.
Affected products
- Vendor n/a Product Openshift Defaultn/a
- Version 4.8.17StatusaffectedConstraints-
- Version
Default status is the baseline for the product, each version can override it (e.g. patched versions marked unaffected).
| Vendor | Product | Default status | Versions | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | Openshift | n/a |
|
Configuration 1
- 2.0
- 4.0
Configuration 2
- 34
- 35
No data.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
automation-controller
Will not fix
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
openshift
Will not fix
| Product | Package | State | Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | automation-controller | Will not fix | n/a |
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | openshift | Will not fix | n/a |
No package ranges for this CVE.
Remediation
No remediation recorded yet.
Metrics
No CVSS v4.0 score for this CVE.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
No CVSS v3.0 score for this CVE.
No CVSS v2.0 score for this CVE.
This CVE is not in the KEV list.
No CISA SSVC assessment for this CVE yet.
Estimated probability of exploitation in the wild in the next 30 days (FIRST EPSS). As of Oct 1, 2026.
Score over time
2022–2026- EPSS v2
- EPSS v3
- EPSS v4
- EPSS v5
Percentile over time
- EPSS v2
- EPSS v3
- EPSS v4
- EPSS v5
Table of values (10 key points)
Flat stretches are collapsed; showing up to 120 newest points.
| Date | Score | Percentile | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | 0.41% (0.00413) | 33.15th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Jun 15, 2026 | 0.34% (0.00341) | 25.67th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Mar 17, 2025 | 0.10% (0.00097) | 24.82th | v4 (v2025.03.14) |
| Dec 12, 2024 | 0.07% (0.00065) | 30.40th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| May 17, 2024 | 0.07% (0.00065) | 27.89th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Sep 8, 2023 | 0.06% (0.00064) | 25.85th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Aug 2, 2023 | 0.05% (0.00052) | 18.54th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Mar 7, 2023 | 0.05% (0.00049) | 15.33th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Mar 6, 2023 | 0.89% (0.00885) | 27.89th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
| Sep 2, 2022 | 0.89% (0.00885) | 26.14th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
References (4)
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1632 Vendor Advisory
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181 Issue TrackingVendor Advisory
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1632
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1632
| Link | Providers | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1632 | Vendor Advisory | |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181 | Issue TrackingVendor Advisory | |
| https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1632 | ||
| https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1632 |
Change history (0)
No recorded changes yet.