binutils: heap-based buffer overflow in function _bfd_archive_64_bit_slurp_armap in archive64.c
Published Feb 24, 2019
7.8
HIGHCVSS 3.1
EPSS 1.68%
Description
An issue was discovered in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.32. It is a heap-based buffer overflow in _bfd_archive_64_bit_slurp_armap in archive64.c.
Affected products
No data.
Configuration 2
- n/a
- n/a
Configuration 3
- 18.04
Configuration 4
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
- 14.1.0
- 15.0.0
No data.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
binutils
Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
binutils
Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
binutils
Will not fix
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
binutils
Will not fix
| Product | Package | State | Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | binutils | Not affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | binutils | Not affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | binutils | Will not fix | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | binutils | Will not fix | n/a |
No package ranges for this CVE.
Remediation
Red Hat statement
The issue is classified as moderate severity primarily because binutils is not typically exposed to untrusted inputs in most environments, limiting its exploitation potential. Moreover, binutils does not handle privileged operations, meaning exploitation is unlikely to lead to system compromise or escalation of privileges. Additionally, the impact is localized to the application itself, without affecting the broader system or network security. As per upstream binutils security policy this issue is not considered as a security flaw. Basically the key element of the policy that affects this is the understanding that analysis of untrusted binaries must always be done in a sandbox because the ELF format is open ended enough to make the analysis tools do anything, like including and processing arbitrary files. This eliminates the only possible vulnerability vector here, which is the possibility of a user being tricked into downloading and analyzing an untrusted ELF without sandboxing. See the binutils security policy for more details: https://sourceware.org/cgit/binutils-gdb/tree/binutils/SECURITY.txt
Metrics
No CVSS v4.0 score for this CVE.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
This CVE is not in the KEV list.
No CISA SSVC assessment for this CVE yet.
Estimated probability of exploitation in the wild in the next 30 days (FIRST EPSS). As of Oct 2, 2026.
Score over time
2021–2026- EPSS v1
- EPSS v5
- EPSS v2
- EPSS v3
- EPSS v4
Percentile over time
- EPSS v1
- EPSS v5
- EPSS v2
- EPSS v3
- EPSS v4
Table of values (15 key points)
Flat stretches are collapsed; showing up to 120 newest points.
| Date | Score | Percentile | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2026 | 1.68% (0.01683) | 76.16th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Jun 15, 2026 | 1.70% (0.01697) | 74.10th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Mar 30, 2025 | 0.54% (0.00541) | 64.99th | v4 (v2025.03.14) |
| Mar 29, 2025 | 1.87% (0.01866) | 72.06th | v4 (v2025.03.14) |
| Mar 17, 2025 | 0.54% (0.00541) | 65.65th | v4 (v2025.03.14) |
| Dec 12, 2024 | 0.11% (0.00115) | 46.83th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Jun 14, 2024 | 0.12% (0.00119) | 46.35th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Mar 7, 2023 | 0.12% (0.00119) | 44.31th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Mar 6, 2023 | 1.11% (0.01108) | 55.18th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
| Apr 1, 2022 | 1.11% (0.01108) | 51.54th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
| Feb 4, 2022 | 3.31% (0.03305) | 65.81th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
| Feb 3, 2022 | 7.04% (0.07038) | 83.71th | v1 |
| Jan 6, 2022 | 7.04% (0.07038) | 83.55th | v1 |
| Jan 5, 2022 | 1.66% (0.01659) | 74.85th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Apr 14, 2021 | 1.45% (0.01454) | 0.00th | v1 |
References (11)
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00078.html vendor-advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-11/msg00004.html vendor-advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-9075 Vendor Advisory
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680669 Issue Tracking
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9075
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-24 vendor-advisoryx_refsource_GENTOOThird Party Advisory
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190314-0003/ x_refsource_CONFIRMPatchThird Party Advisory
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24236 x_refsource_MISCExploitIssue TrackingThird Party Advisory
- https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K42059040 x_refsource_CONFIRMThird Party Advisory
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/4336-1/ vendor-advisoryx_refsource_UBUNTUThird Party Advisory
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9075
| Link | Providers | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00078.html | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory | |
| http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-11/msg00004.html | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory | |
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-9075 | Vendor Advisory | |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680669 | Issue Tracking | |
| https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9075 | ||
| https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-24 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_GENTOOThird Party Advisory | |
| https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190314-0003/ | x_refsource_CONFIRMPatchThird Party Advisory | |
| https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24236 | x_refsource_MISCExploitIssue TrackingThird Party Advisory | |
| https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K42059040 | x_refsource_CONFIRMThird Party Advisory | |
| https://usn.ubuntu.com/4336-1/ | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_UBUNTUThird Party Advisory | |
| https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9075 |
Change history (0)
No recorded changes yet.