Back

HIGH

samba: Some code path don't enforce smb signing, when they should

Published Jul 26, 2018

Description

It was found that samba before 4.4.16, 4.5.x before 4.5.14, and 4.6.x before 4.6.8 did not enforce "SMB signing" when certain configuration options were enabled. A remote attacker could launch a man-in-the-middle attack and retrieve information in plain-text.

Affected products

Remediation

Red Hat mitigation

The missing implied signing for 'smb2mount -e', 'smbcacls -e' and 'smbcquotas -e' can be enforced by explicitly using '--signing=required' on the commandline or "client signing = required" in smb.conf.

Metrics

Weaknesses (1)

References (16)

Change history (0)

No recorded changes yet.

Sources
CVE.org / MITRE
Status PUBLISHED
Assigner redhat
Published Jul 26, 2018
Updated Aug 5, 2024
Reserved Aug 1, 2017
NVD
Status Modified
Modified Jun 17, 2026
Red Hat
Severity Moderate
Public date Sep 20, 2017