glibc: libtirpc: stack (frame) overflow in Sun RPC clntudp_call()
Published Jun 10, 2016
5.9
MEDIUMCVSS 3.1
EPSS 4.54%
Description
Stack-based buffer overflow in the clntudp_call function in sunrpc/clnt_udp.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly unspecified other impact via a flood of crafted ICMP and UDP packets.
Affected products
No data.
Configuration 3
- 12.04
- 14.04
- 16.04
- 18.04
No data.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
compat-glibc
Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
glibc
Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
compat-glibc
Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
glibc
Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
libtirpc
Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
compat-glibc
Not affected
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
glibc
Will not fix
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
libtirpc
Will not fix
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
glibc
Not affected
| Product | Package | State | Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | compat-glibc | Not affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | glibc | Not affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | compat-glibc | Not affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | glibc | Not affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | libtirpc | Not affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | compat-glibc | Not affected | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | glibc | Will not fix | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | libtirpc | Will not fix | n/a |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | glibc | Not affected | n/a |
No package ranges for this CVE.
Remediation
Red Hat statement
Based on technical analysis of this flaw: On Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6: No looping behaviour was observed. Without the looping behavior, the alloca should be harmless for pretty much all applications because the size argument depends on the size of the generated (outgoing) UDP packet and will be well below default stack sizes. Therefore it is not affected by this flaw. On Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7: Looping behaviour was observed and segfaults with small stack sizes. -fstack-class-protection will turn this into a reliable crash (no code execution possible). Even without that build flag, this will not be exploitable in most cases because the application determines the alloca argument, based on the generated UDP packet (not the response). This will usually be smaller than a page. The maximum impact is therefore crash, there is no code execution involved. This issue was fixed in glibc-2.23.1, therefore Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 is not affected by this flaw.
Metrics
No CVSS v4.0 score for this CVE.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
No CVSS v3.0 score for this CVE.
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
This CVE is not in the KEV list.
No CISA SSVC assessment for this CVE yet.
Estimated probability of exploitation in the wild in the next 30 days (FIRST EPSS). As of Oct 1, 2026.
Score over time
2022–2026- EPSS v2
- EPSS v3
- EPSS v4
- EPSS v5
Percentile over time
- EPSS v2
- EPSS v3
- EPSS v4
- EPSS v5
Table of values (11 key points)
Flat stretches are collapsed; showing up to 120 newest points.
| Date | Score | Percentile | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | 4.54% (0.04543) | 91.27th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Jun 15, 2026 | 3.95% (0.03954) | 89.05th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Mar 17, 2025 | 1.35% (0.01355) | 78.81th | v4 (v2025.03.14) |
| Dec 12, 2024 | 0.55% (0.00545) | 78.15th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Feb 8, 2024 | 0.55% (0.00545) | 76.70th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Apr 1, 2023 | 0.55% (0.00545) | 73.94th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Mar 7, 2023 | 0.53% (0.00528) | 73.46th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Mar 6, 2023 | 1.54% (0.01537) | 74.52th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
| Feb 23, 2023 | 1.54% (0.01537) | 74.48th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
| Apr 1, 2022 | 1.54% (0.01537) | 72.41th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
| Feb 4, 2022 | 1.54% (0.01537) | 51.33th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
References (15)
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-06/msg00030.html vendor-advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-07/msg00039.html vendor-advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039 x_refsource_CONFIRMBroken Link
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102073 vdb-entryx_refsource_BIDThird Party AdvisoryVDB Entry
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4429 Vendor Advisory
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337136 Issue Tracking
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/06/msg00027.html mailing-listx_refsource_MLIST
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4429
- https://source.android.com/security/bulletin/2017-12-01 x_refsource_CONFIRMThird Party Advisory
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20112 x_refsource_CONFIRMIssue TrackingPatchThird Party Advisory
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git%3Bh=bc779a1a5b3035133024b21e2f339fe4219fb11c x_refsource_CONFIRM
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3759-1/ vendor-advisoryx_refsource_UBUNTUThird Party Advisory
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3759-2/ vendor-advisoryx_refsource_UBUNTUThird Party Advisory
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-4429
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html x_refsource_MISC
Change history (0)
No recorded changes yet.