The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities
Published Jul 9, 2012
7.4
HIGHCVSS 3.1
EPSS 0.94%
Description
The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance "does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.
Affected products
No data.
- n/a
No data.
No Red Hat product state for this CVE.
No package ranges for this CVE.
Remediation
No remediation recorded yet.
Metrics
No CVSS v4.0 score for this CVE.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
No CVSS v3.0 score for this CVE.
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
This CVE is not in the KEV list.
CISA SSVC (Vulnrichment)
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization from CISA ADP.
Exploitation
NoneAutomatable
NoTechnical Impact
TotalDecision
n/aAssessed Jan 21, 2025 · SSVC 2.0.3
Estimated probability of exploitation in the wild in the next 30 days (FIRST EPSS). As of Oct 1, 2026.
Score over time
2022–2026- EPSS v2
- EPSS v3
- EPSS v4
- EPSS v5
Percentile over time
- EPSS v2
- EPSS v3
- EPSS v4
- EPSS v5
Table of values (12 key points)
Flat stretches are collapsed; showing up to 120 newest points.
| Date | Score | Percentile | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | 0.94% (0.00938) | 59.47th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Jun 15, 2026 | 0.94% (0.00938) | 56.09th | v5 (v2026.06.15) |
| Mar 17, 2025 | 0.08% (0.00084) | 22.20th | v4 (v2025.03.14) |
| Dec 12, 2024 | 0.10% (0.00101) | 43.13th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| May 3, 2024 | 0.10% (0.00097) | 40.27th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Mar 15, 2024 | 0.09% (0.00093) | 38.18th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Feb 8, 2024 | 0.08% (0.00079) | 32.01th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Mar 7, 2023 | 0.10% (0.00101) | 39.85th | v3 (v2023.03.01) |
| Mar 6, 2023 | 1.02% (0.01018) | 40.69th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
| Sep 10, 2022 | 1.02% (0.01018) | 38.88th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
| Apr 1, 2022 | 1.02% (0.01018) | 36.86th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
| Feb 4, 2022 | 1.02% (0.01018) | 19.50th | v2 (v2022.01.01) |
References (5)
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html mailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ
- http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/ x_refsource_MISC
- http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/ x_refsource_MISC
- https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372 x_refsource_MISC
- https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt x_refsource_MISC
| Link | Providers | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html | mailing-listx_refsource_BUGTRAQ | |
| http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/ | x_refsource_MISC | |
| http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/ | x_refsource_MISC | |
| https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372 | x_refsource_MISC | |
| https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt | x_refsource_MISC |
Change history (0)
No recorded changes yet.